• HOME
  • About
    • Musicians
    • Spotlights
    • Videos
    • Photos
  • News
    • Concerts And Events
    • Arts Advocacy
  • HISTORY
    • ASOPA Press Releases
    • Letters
    • Blogs
    • ICSOM/AFM SUPPORT
  • Donate
    • How You Can Help
  • Contact Us
  • HOME
  • HOME
  • About
    • Musicians
    • Spotlights
    • Videos
    • Photos
  • News
    • Concerts And Events
    • Arts Advocacy
  • HISTORY
    • ASOPA Press Releases
    • Letters
    • Blogs
    • ICSOM/AFM SUPPORT
  • Donate
    • How You Can Help
  • Contact Us
  • HOME
ATL SYMPHONY MUSICIANS

Atlanta Symphony Musicians Offer $4 Million Over Next Two Years to Close Budget Gap; Woodruff Arts Center Executive Board Refuses, Locks Out Musicians and Cancels Healthcare Benefits

9/4/2012

13 Comments

 
Atlanta, GA, September 4, 2012:  On August 24, in an unprecedented effort to reach agreement on terms of a new collective bargaining agreement, the Atlanta Symphony Orchestra Players Committee (ASOPA) offered very deep cuts in the Orchestra to the Atlanta Symphony Management negotiating team and the ASO Board. The $4 million in concessions offered by the 88 current Musicians of the ASO would be combined with parallel income cuts for those on the approximately 75-member ASO administrative staff who are paid at least the minimum salary of ASO musicians.  

ASO negotiators and staff, together with ASO board members, applauded with appreciation the musicians’ enormous offer of concessions, expressing privately that musicians have given enough - that the musicians should hold firm while an agreement was worked out with others. They also asked ASOPA to avoid talking with the press or even releasing full details of the talks to the Orchestra musicians, a request with which ASOPA agreed and has cooperated fully. Meanwhile, the WAC cancelled the musicians’ August 31 paychecks, as well as their health, dental, and disability insurance. 

Despite behind-the-scenes efforts by ASO Board and community leaders in communication with the WAC Executive Board, many frustrated ASO board members and staff now stand beside ASO musicians in dismay at the WAC Executive Board’s refusal to allow any compromise. 

As informal discussions continued into last week about how to close the dramatically reduced gap between the musicians’ and ASO’s proposals, an ASO Executive Board Committee member communicated the reaction of the Woodruff Arts Center Executive Board to the progress in an e-mail message shared with musicians by ASO CEO Stanley Romanstein.  “…[W]hile the gap has been substantially reduced, … the WAC Governing Board has made the final decision that the ‘best and final offer’… can be no less than the $2.6M in concessions presented in our last offer. As you know, the WAC signs the union agreement so they do have the last word in these matters. They are fully prepared for a work stoppage”. 

The message goes on to say that “while the support of the ASO Executive Cmte would be preferred, the final decision lies with the WAC Governing Board. Due to representations made to investors and key donors as well as the rating agencies, we must achieve and balanced budget and we require that half of the $5M gap comes from the contract with the musicians.” Acknowledging an “alternative solution…crafted…by the ASO [that] was reviewed by [WAC Executive Board members and staff]…that option was rejected as the union concession was still less than the $2.6M that they are requiring.” 

The e-mail added: “With regard to negative PR, they feel that the ASO and the WAC are sufficiently prepared and ready to deal with this matter. They consider the risk of not achieving a balanced budget is far greater than any negative PR. This applies to considering the implication to fundraising, ticket sales and the negative impact to other divisions of the WAC. Therefore WAC Governing Board has decided that there is no need for an extension to further internally discuss options or PR implications, the senior team at the WAC Governing Board has reviewed the matter and has made a final decision.” 

The communication ends with the assertion that “the team is making plans to deal with the impact of the work stoppage. Therefore we will redirect our energies in that direction, continue to update and execute on our PR plan and determine next steps on negotiations.” 

The WAC’s assertion that there is a $5 million budget gap misstates the facts: According to the ASO’s own budget documents, the deficit for Fiscal Year 2012 was $2.7 million, and a $1.5 million deficit is budgeted for Fiscal Year 2013. The Musicians have offered $2 million in concessions for each of the 2012-13 and 2013-14 contract years. Additional administrative staff cuts that the parties have agreed to would further bridge the gap, as would aggressive initiatives to review all costs and expenditures of the ASO and its subsidiary entities, Verizon Wireless Amphitheatre  and SD&A Teleservices, to reduce waste and find other savings. Yet, somehow finding that half of the made-up $5 million gap equals $2.6 million, the WAC punitively insists that the musicians alone – the costs of whom comprise only 28% of the ASO budget -- bear the entire budget burden.

Most arts executives and boards across the nation realize that for a non-profit to deeply cut and demean its primary product is not effective either for fundraising or fulfillment of its mission to the community. Community leaders and the musicians wonder when the ASO as an institution will be able to chart its own destiny, in light of the clear evidence that the WAC cares only about penalizing the musicians, regardless of how much damage is done to the award-winning legacies of ASO artistic leaders Robert Shaw, Yoel Levi, Robert Spano and Donald Runnicles.

The Musicians’ reality is that:

  • As of August 26th, ASO musicians have been without any pay or benefits, also known as being locked out. 
  • On August 31, health, dental, and disability insurance policies for all musicians, several of whom are battling cancer and other debilitating health crises, have also been cancelled by the WAC as threatened. This is contrary to Stanley Romanstein’s denial of that fact reported in the August 26 edition of the AJC:  “The musicians — who are full-time employees — had feared that if a deal was not made, they would be locked out without pay and health benefits. ASO president Stanley Romanstein has denied that, but in a letter to the musicians from executive vice president for business operations Donald Fox, he indicated that they had no authority to continue benefits beyond Aug. 25.” 
  • All musicians’ access cards to Symphony Hall and parking decks have been deactivated. 
  • Extra off-duty police have been hired at an undisclosed cost to patrol the WAC campus, creating the armed camp effect apparently sought by the WAC, despite no statements, threats or actions by ASO musicians that would necessitate such tactics and expense.
  • All scheduled work for the Orchestra through September 24 has been canceled.
  • The WAC Executive Board's actions threaten the ASO and the WAC itself, especially coming at a time when the WAC admits that the ASO budget gap is so close to being bridged. Their insistence on $2.6 million in cuts to the musicians alone, regardless of any other factors, certainly implies a misplaced priority of budgeting over mission, and suggests that they do not have in mind the best interests of the Atlanta Symphony, the communities it serves, or Atlanta itself, whose world-wide reputation the ASO enhances.  
###

Contact: Colin Williams 
(404) 275-4997 
ASOPASpokesperson@gmail.com
Or 
Daniel Laufer
ASOPAPresident@gmail.com
www.ATLsymphonymusicians.com
Facebook: ATLSymphonyMusicians
Twitter: @ATLSymphonyMusicians


13 Comments
Dickie Z
9/4/2012 10:08:47 am

Off-duty police?!? Wow.

Reply
pat klobas
9/4/2012 06:31:58 pm

sad...

Reply
Edward Hoffman link
9/4/2012 02:28:10 pm

Obviously an effort by the WAC to decimate the Atlanta Symphony musicians. One wonders what they are thinking in locking out the musicians and ending their benefits. Anyone would look at this and say that they are trying to end the musical excellence that Atlanta has produced over the last many years.

What about the audience....obviously not considered. what about donors...obviously not considered.

In a very wonderful and informative book written by Michael Kaiser called "The Art of the Turnaround" one of his rules for reviving failing arts organizations is to "Never diminish the artistic Product". Sounds like the WAC intends not only to diminish the artistic product but to make it less appealing and less attractive. Is management still getting paid?
Security around the WAC campus? Hysteric over-dramatics to imply that the musicians are dangerous.

Perhaps they could take some of that off-duty police money and other funds and put that towards a settlement. talk about a waste!!!

There are some seriously stupid people in positions of power in the Atlanta WAC....

Reply
Spence
9/8/2012 05:42:21 am

This is what happens when you have business people who don't know anything about music, and musicians who don't know anything about business. It behaves any music major with a masters degree or a DMA to also get an MBA. We need more people with with savvy in both arenas....... great players with business skills.

Reply
Spence
9/8/2012 05:43:21 am

behooves** damn auto spellcheck.

Robin Wooten Thompson
9/4/2012 02:57:22 pm

Unbelievable on the part of the WAC! Hiring the extra security takes the cake. If I were an orchestra member, I would never play for the ASO again, regardless of any reconciliation efforts (if there ever are any). This is such sad news for the entire southeast. I have traveled 300 miles round-trip from Alabama many times to hear the ASO over the years. The quality of the performances are superb! I am very disappointed in the WAC board.

Reply
Helen T
9/4/2012 03:28:40 pm

The musicians have made a commendable sacrificial effort to make a short term fix for some huge long term problems. The Woodruff board, by taking a unpopular but essential stand, seems to be seeking a remedy that will insure the survival of the ASO and the Woodruff into the future. It is quietly obvious that the incompetent ASO management, and spineless board, are incapable of doing anything other than shuffling for quick fixes to save their own employment and face. Pity the musicians, general staff, Woodruff board, ticket buyers & donors have to take the hit for years of ASO Vulgamore & post-Vulgamore senior management team malfeasance - and a lack of ASO board fiduciary oversight & responsibility.

Reply
Michael Bee
9/5/2012 02:54:39 am

"To make the world safe for those who own it, politically active elements of the owning class have created a national security state that expends billions of dollars and enlists the efforts of vast numbers of people." Michael Parenti

Reply
crooklyn
9/5/2012 07:28:51 am

Yeah, there IS that whole supply and demand thing.....

Reply
LarryM
9/7/2012 03:26:25 am

I think that many things are wrong here. First no business in their RIGHT mind can expect to make a quick fix and expect that to work. But why is there wasteful spending in the ASO? Tough economic times came about nearly 4 years ago now. Those things should have been cut LONG AGO! I know for a fact that they Musicians of the ASO are paid more than they should be.

As for benefit reductions and people not getting pay because they now cannot work. Take a look at the recent Louisville Orchestra situation. 100% of the members of the Louisville Orchestra have additional FULL TIME JOBS! ALL of them are supplied with additional benefits. But they too used the same *cry* that the world was over for them.Even though they still had additional jobs making on average of $45,000 with benefits. Thats why it is LAUGHABLE when the excuse of losing benefits and pay. Making it seem and sound like the musicians are now not able to eat or pay bills.

There are other jobs open. There are other opportunities. If you are unhappy with the ASO and the reckless spending, then one should pursue other outlets. Having 75 people as office staff is CRAZY. There are organizations in the music world that do far more than the ASO could and would ever do that operate on staff of 5-10 EFFECTIVELY! I am sure that cutting 50 staff positions would have saved the ASO from ever enterting this situation.

End point.... As an AFM member MYSELF, concede to the pay cuts, suck it up in order to keep your job. If not it is obvious that you will STILL not have a job.... You will STILL not be paid,... You will STILL be without benefits.... Only one thing will have been accomplished... THERE WILL NO LONGER BE AN ASO.

Please read the statement by the WAC....They are looking at replacing the ASO Orchestra! They will find an alternative that meets the needs of the WAC! And there will be NO ONE TO BLAME but the members of the ASO!

Please post more solid numbers.... How much do members earn in weekly pay? $500, $1,000, $2,000 What is it? Make it more known what you are being paid. That way Music Educators and others that are also professionals can see how childish you are being because they don't make NO WHERE near what you are making.

Reply
Big5guy
9/7/2012 03:05:35 pm

*Yawn* Heard all of this irrelevant rhetoric before. I was chairman of my orchestra's last contract negotiations, and I won't waste too much time (in fact, I'll just scratch the surface) debunking this so-called argument.

Who cares what the ASO musicians make? Who cares what an NFL, MLB, or NBA player makes? Or an Attorney? Or Doctor? What's the point about being enraged at a world-class musician's salary? Envious? Do their salaries affect your taxes? I thought not.

As far as educators are concerned (I am one, and I know many), they are thrilled when one of their students wins an audition and makes it to "the big time." Just as middle school or high school coaches are happy when one of their students has a successful sports career. Isn't it safe to assume that this former student might make more money than his former HS coach, who is an educator? I thought so.

In business, the market determines the price. The market for the ASO is its peer orchestras in the USA. So, "Who cares what the ASO musicians make?" The best of the talented musicians, now and in the future. The ASO will not be able to attract and retain the best talent out there if they aren't competitive with their peer orchestras, resulting in a decline, community interest, relevance, etc. Everyone wants the Falcons, Hawks, and Braves to spend money on its product to be competitive with their respective sports leagues? Right? I thought so. Oh, unless you would prefer to have a community orchestra. I kinda thought Atlanta was a major-league type city.

*Yawn* Enough of this non-issue.

Reply
Steven Thomas
9/9/2012 08:42:29 am

"I know for a fact that they Musicians of the ASO are paid more than they should be." - I love it when someone says something so stupid it saves me the time reading the rest of the comment. "You KNOW for a FACT" - wow - to be so sure of one's knowledge and perfection. Scary that this is an AFM member. (Obviously one with no talent or standards of musical quality) Folks, you have just met your first scab.

Reply
Steven Thomas
9/9/2012 08:36:10 am

Being from the outside, this may be a completely naive/impractical idea - is there any way the ASO can divorce itself from the WAC wackos? Find a new performance venue, for now at least, to reduce the impact to musicians, audience and friendly board members? Forcing the WAC to downsize because of their inability to manage their business, and ultimately making them irrelevant would be the best long-term outcome. The best form of revenge is success elsewhere.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Community
    In The News
    Show Your Support

    Author

    ATL Symphony Musicians

    Archives

    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2017
    November 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012

    RSS Feed